Legal Opinion
Hood v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 3, 1930No. 20691PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.
This case comes before this court on appeal from the district court of Beaver county, Okla.
R. M. Hood, plaintiff in error, was plaintiff in the trial court; A. B. Miller, defendant in error, was defendant in the trial court, and the parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared below.
The plaintiff, R. M. Hood, filed his petition in the district court of Beaver county, the allegations of which are in substance as follows:
Defendant Miller was duly elected to the office of county treasurer of Beaver county, Okla., at the general election held in November', 1924, qualified, and entered…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State ex rel. Covington v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- City Council v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Prowell v. State ex rel. HastySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Beals v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- County of Scott v. RingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stain v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Miller v. Board of Com'rs of Beaver CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State ex rel. Rives v. HerringNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Opinion No., Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1980
- Opinion No. (1979), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.