People v. Dee
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we are compelled to strike a prior conviction sentence enhancement because of trial counsel’s error in waiving a jury trial on the enhancement allegation after the judge prematurely discharged the jury.
An information charged Ricky Lamar Dee with possession of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350). It also alleged a prior conviction and prison term (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). Trial of the charged offense and the prior conviction allegation was bifurcated. A jury convicted Dee of the charged offense.
Once the verdict was read and the jury was polled, the court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Conrad v. Ball Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. EsquibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.