Legal Opinion

People v. Dee

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1990No. A046986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we are compelled to strike a prior conviction sentence enhancement because of trial counsel’s error in waiving a jury trial on the enhancement allegation after the judge prematurely discharged the jury.

An information charged Ricky Lamar Dee with possession of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350). It also alleged a prior conviction and prison term (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). Trial of the charged offense and the prior conviction allegation was bifurcated. A jury convicted Dee of the charged offense.

Once the verdict was read and the jury was polled, the court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Conrad v. Ball Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. EsquibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API