Legal Opinion

Reece v. Reece

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant’s motion challenges the jurisdiction of the court and is without merit as to plaintiff’s primary cause of action. The plea of former action pending is not jurisdictional, though sometimes referred to as such. It is a plea in abatement provided to avoid the splitting of actions and the piecemeal trial of controversies, prevent a multiplicity of suits between the same parties concerning the same subject matter, and eliminate the possibility of conflicting verdicts and judgments based on substantially the same evidence. The court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allen v. . SalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Skittletharpe v. Skittletharpe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Long v. . JarrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Russos v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Alexander v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Blankenship v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API