Legal Opinion

Griggs v. City of Vincennes

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1922No. 11,195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Knox Circuit Court; Hileary Q. Houghton, Special Judge. ■ Action by Joseph T Griggs against the city of Vincennes and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

— Action by appellant to enjoin appellees from the collection of $9,754.27 against his forty-four acres of unplatted real estate in the corporate limits of the city of Vincennes, for the construction of a sanitary local and district sewer. A temporary restraining order was issued.

Appellees filed their demurrer to appellant’s second amended complaint, mentioned hereinafter as complaint, and the court’s ruling in sustaining appellees’ demurrer, and in sustaining appellees’ motion to dissolve the temporary restraining order, are each assigned as error.

It appears by the complaint that appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Wilt v. BueterIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bass v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kellems v. Republic Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prott v. City of GaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Goodwin v. Calumet Supply CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Windhorst v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API