Legal Opinion
Bielaska v. Town of Waterford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 7, 1985No. 12277PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the minor plaintiff as a result of the shattering of a wired glass panel in a school corridor smoke door. Following a jury verdict for the plaintiffs, the defendants brought this *152appeal, claiming: (1) that the court erred in permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint; (2) that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict; and (3) that General Statutes § 10-235 precluded an action against the defendant board of education. We find no error.
From the evidence presented the jury could…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Antonofsky v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Gallo v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Pelletier v. BilbilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kevin Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Rosick v. Equipment Maintenance & Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.