Legal Opinion · Dissent

Freeman v. Bean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1934Published

1DissentFinch, P. J.

I vote to reverse the order appealed from and deny the motion to vacate the service. The White Motor Company while nominally a defendant is in reality a plaintiff against whom no judgment is demanded, nor any decree to restrict or enjoin. On the contrary, the action is primarily for its benefit. Any recovery will belong to it. Its status as a plaintiff is seen in the fact that it could appeal even though the complaint was dismissed as against all the defendants. (Sheridan v. Sheridan Electric Light Co., 38 Hun, 396.) In Holmes v. Camp (219 N. Y. 359, at p. 373) the court said: “ While it is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Hanna v. . StedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Holmes v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Grant v. . Cobre Grande Copper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API