Legal Opinion

Ex parte Morel

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 15, 1923No. 7510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above), This is a peculiar case. There is none like it in the books. The decision of the District Court of the Southern District of New York is not published. The per curiam decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals contains 90 words, aside from the citation of two cases. The case involves the welfare of three persons — one a child, a citizen^ of the United States, born since the court decisions; another the wife, born in the United States, never lived elsewhere, who lost her citizenship by marriage with the petitioner; and the petitioner, a resident of the United…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  3. Gegiow v. UhlSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Temescal Rock Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard v. National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  2. Ex Parte HingDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
  3. People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API