Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lowell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1930No. Docket No. 148, Calendar No. 34,705Published

1DissentButzel, J.

I cannot agree with the conclusion as set forth in the very able and forceful opinion of my colleague, Justice Fead. The rule of statutory repeal by implication, as set forth therein, first appears in the “History of the Pleas of the Crown,” by Sir Mathew Hale. He discusses an act of parliament, 1 Edw. VI, cap. 12, which repeals certain penal statutes. Hale’s philosophic comments or dictum seem to be the basis, or at least the first expression, of the rule of construction under discussion in the present ease. Miller’s Case (1764), 1 Wm. Bl. 451, so frequently cited, seems to have been the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hartung v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In re LambrechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. Perkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Common Council of Detroit v. RushMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API