Legal Opinion
Richard v. National City Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The question is whether the provision of the Glass-Steagall Banking Act permitting the removal of certain actions against national banks from state courts to the District Court (Act June 16, 1933, e. 88, § 15; [12 USCA § 632]) applies to suits pending in a state court at the time when the act took effect.
The relevant portion of the statute reads :
Section 25 (b). “Notwithstanding any other provision of law all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity to which any corporation organized under the laws of the United States shall be a party, arising out of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. KalinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Tri-Lakes SS Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Bickford's, Inc. v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934