Legal Opinion
State v. Jim
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1978No. 5900PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MENOR, J.
Upon his plea of guilty, the defendant was in due course sentenced for the offense first degree theft. Prior to sentence being imposed, however, he had moved for withdrawal of his guilty plea. His motion was denied, and this denial constitutes the basis for the defendant’s appeal from the judgment and sentence of the trial court.
H.R.Cr.P. Rule 32 (d) under which the motion for withdrawal of guilty plea was made provided as follows:
Withdrawal of Plea of Guilty. A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere may be made only before sentence is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Michael Joseph Paradiso and Anthony Richard Bonnacci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- John A. Gearhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Bernard Cyril Meaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MerinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ChristianHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AhloHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. GomesHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. TopasnaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.