Legal Opinion

State v. Topasna

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2000No. 22606PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

LIM, J.

In his appeal of the circuit court of the first circuit’s May 21, 1999 judgment, guilty conviction and sentence, Defendant-Appellant Alfred Topasna (Topasna) contends that the court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas.

Throughout his change-of-plea colloquy with the court, Topasna was extremely hesitant and reluctant to change his pleas. To-pasna changed his mind immediately after changing his pleas and the next day told his attorney to move to withdraw the pleas. During the hearing on his motion, Topasna steadfastly maintained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. MerinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. DicksHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Carvalho v. OlimHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Foo v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. MarkHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. TuialiiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Cun-Lara v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. AetoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API