Legal Opinion

State v. Montano

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2003No. CR-99-0439-APPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

77 P.3d 1246 (2003)

206 Ariz. 296

STATE of Arizona, Appellee,

v.

Danny N. MONTANO, Appellant.

No. CR-99-0439-AP.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

October 21, 2003.

Janet Napolitano, Former Attorney General, Terry Goddard, Attorney General, Phoenix, by Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Capital Litigation Section and Robert L. Ellman, James P. Beene, John P. Todd and Bruce M. Ferg, Assistant Attorneys General, Tucson, Attorneys for the State of Arizona.

Law Office of Carla G. Ryan, by Carla G. Ryan, Tucson, Attorney for Danny N. Montano.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 The only issue before…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. State v. TrostleArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State v. MurdaughArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Planning Group of Scottsdale, L.L.C. v. Lake Mathews Mineral Properties, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cash Distributing Co., Inc. v. NeelyMississippi Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API