Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Hurley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1910No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent; McDonald, J. Replevin by George N. Hanna against William J. Hurley. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This case was tried by the court without a jury. Certain findings of fact and law were filed by the court, which sufficiently disclose the nature of the controversy. They are as follows:

“Facts.
“ (1) I find that on April 33, 1908, George D. Hanna became surety upon an appeal bond on appeal to this court from the justice court of Grand Rapids by Joseph Dahrooge from a judgment rendered against him in favor of Nathan Kronman. Said bond was in the usual form. Plaintiff in this cause, George N. Hanna, was engaged in business in the city of Grand Rapids. Said George D. Hanna was a cousin of George…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cutler v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bowen v. State ex rel. BradburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. John Russell v. James Stinsons.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Karst v. GaneNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  2. Farrell v. PaulusMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Patmos v. Grand Rapids Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Wiener v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  5. Wiener v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API