Legal Opinion

Bowen v. State ex rel. Bradbury

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1889No. 12,326PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

— This is an action brought in the name of the State, on the relation of William H. Bradbury, as guardian of the estate of Clara B. Bowman, a minor, against the other parties to the action, upon a bond executed by Daniel W. Mason as the former guardian of said ward, on which bond executed by Mason William C. Bowen was surety. At the time the bond was executed by Mason, as guardian, and Bowen as his surety, Bowen was the owner of quite an amount of real estate. Subsequently to the execution of the bond, and before the commencement of this action, Bowen had made a division of his real estate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. McLemore v. NuckollsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Lindley v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sallaske v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Thomson v. CraneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1896
  3. State ex rel. Little v. ParsonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hanna v. HurleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hoosier Construction Co. v. National Bank of CommerceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API