Legal Opinion

Lapham v. Lapham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1927No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The trial court stated the facts:

“Charles Lapham died intestate on October 17, 1902, leaving Julia Lapham, his widow, and Benjamin, George, James, John, Thomas A., Barney, Willis, and Charles, sons, and Caroline Wiegand and May Frances Lapham, daughters, as his heirs at law. Benjamin, George, James, and John Lapham, and Caroline Wiegand were the children of his first wife, now deceased, and the remaining children were those of his second wife, Julia Lapham.
“At one time the deceased owned 250 acres of land situate in the township of Ecorse, in said county, but eventually he conveyed away as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Avery v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Heinecke v. PortusMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lapham v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Ryckman v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. William E Kasben v. Joseph T KasbenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API