Legal Opinion

Heinecke v. Portus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1941No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 41,715PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff, the daughter of Anna M. Isbell, deceased, is the administratrix of her estate and her sole heir at law.

On March 19, 1940, Mrs. Isbell executed a deed to certain property then occupied by her in the city of Pontiac naming defendant Prank Portus as the grantee. Mrs. Isbell died on April 21, 1940. Some two weeks before her death she gave this deed to a friend, Mrs. Christina Siminton, who attended her during her last illness. At the same time she gave Mrs. Siminton the recording fee and told her that, after she was gone, she wanted the deed put on record. Mrs. Siminton suggested that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Loomis v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hynes v. HalsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Jenkinson v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Meech v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Cook v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Gilmer v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Gilmer v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API