Legal Opinion

Ryckman v. Cooper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1939No. Docket No. 31, Calendar No. 40,605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The bill in this case was filed by six sisters of defendant Joseph E. Cooper to obtain cancellation of a warranty deed to a 280-acre farm, executed by their father and mother to him on Feb ruary 8, 1926, alleging that the deed was placed in escrow and there was no delivery passing title. Joseph E. Cooper, herein styled defendant, filed an answer to the bill and, by cross bill, asked for affirmative relief by way of specific performance of an agreement with his father and mother that he was to have the farm and all personal property thereon if he remained at home and cared for them during…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamb v. HinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Meade v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Cooper v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Cook v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Reed v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Meister v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re Boucher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API