Bigler v. Township of York
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Appellants contend that “Ohio Revised Code section 5553.042 only delineates the procedure to be followed by county commissioners to accomplish the vacation of a township road and does not preclude an action by an abutting land owner to quiet title by establishing abandonment by nonuse for at least twenty-one years.” For the following reasons we disagree with appellants’ assertion and, accordingly, affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
The relevant statute, R.C. 5553.042, provides: “A township shall lose all rights in and to any public road, highway, street, or alley which has been…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burdge v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- New 52 Project, Inc. v. Proctor, Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- New 52 Project v. Proctor, 07ap-487 (2-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. Hamilton County Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Symmes Twp. Bd. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- New 52 Project, Inc. v. Proctor, Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.