Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Hannan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

Defendants Hannan, Coolican, and Watson executed and delivered to defendant Batchelder, in part payment for some land, the following note:

“$1,300.00. Toledo, 0., Nov. 1, 1887.
“On or before one year after date we promise to pay to the order of Wm. M. Batchelder thirteen hundred (1,300) dollars, at Toledo, 0., value received, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum, payable semiannually.
“William W. Hannan. “James S. Coolican. “Balph E. Watson.”

On the 4th of November, 1887, Batchelder transferred the note to Watson by written assignment of the note on the back thereof, as follows:

“Tole…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Curry v. LafonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Gale v. MayhewMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. First National Bank of Seattle v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Walker v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API