Legal Opinion

Brex v. Smith

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 25, 1929PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This application is, in effect, a demand by the prosecutor thatall the bank accounts of all the members of the Newark police department and, in some instances, those of their wives, be submitted to him for examination. The only reason given is "to assist him in some investigation he is making." Presumably, he thinks there may have been in some instances improper reception of money.

The prosecutor contends that a court of equity has no jurisdiction because it cannot enjoin a public official, stating that this court cannot stay or interfere with a criminal proceeding. In the first place, this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Melvin v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. McMann v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Twiss v. State, Dept. of TreasurySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Peterson v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API