Legal Opinion
Hinsdale v. City of Liberal, Kansas
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 21, 1997No. 96-1249-FGTPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
REID, United States Magistrate Judge.
On December 24, 1996, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel, for sanctions, and for extension of scheduling order (Doc. 22-24). Defendants filed a motion for protective order on December 27, 1996 (Doe. 25). Plaintiff filed a response on January 3, 1997 (Doc. 27), and defendant filed a response on January 31, 1997 (Doc. 44). Plaintiff filed a supplemental brief on April 7, 1997 (Doc. 55).
The issue raised by the above motions concerns whether or not executive sessions of the Liberal City Commission are privileged from discovery. The basis…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Kelly v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kodish v. Oakbrook Terrace Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Neuder v. Battelle Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Hinsdale v. City of Liberal, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
- Berroth v. Kansas Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Cottillion v. United Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.