Legal Opinion
Garmany v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-1039PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Roseinia Garmany brings this action on behalf of her son D.G. against the District of Columbia (the “District”) under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act, as amended by the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act (collectively, “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment, disputing whether the hearing officer erred in dismissing Garmany’s due process complaint. Because Garmany has not satisfied her burden of showing that the hearing officer erred, summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Houston Independent School District v. Bobby R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Schoenbach v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson Ex Rel. F.J. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Eley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Colón-Vazquez v. Department of Education of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Ward v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014