Legal Opinion

Nunn v. New

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1950No. A-2384PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

Respondent, Mrs. Alma W. New, joined by her husband, A. E. New, brought this suit against Kenneth W. Nunn in his capacity as City Secretary of Texas City to compel him, by mandamus, to find and certify to the governing body of the city that a petition filed with him as Secretary for an election to recall from their offices L. A. Robinson, Mayor, and Bert E. Conely and Charles L. Vance, Commissioners of the City of Texas City, Texas, was sufficient under the provisions of the city’s charter. Robinson, Conely, and Vance were made parties defendant. The trial court ordered that the writ of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burr v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Hanover Fire Insurance v. Shrader & RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Nunn v. NewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thiel v. Harris County Democratic Executive CommitteeTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of San Antonio v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  3. State v. BlackstockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. BOR. OF EATONTOWN v. DanskinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. Texas Employment Commission v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API