Nunn v. New
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEITH, Chief Justice.
This proceeding was brought by relator, Alma W. New, joined by her husband, A. E. New, for a writ of mandamus commanding respondent Kenneth T. Nunn, in his capacity as city secretary of Texas City, to find and certify to the governing body of the City as sufficient under the provisions of the City’s charter, a petition filed by re-lators, and supplements thereto, for an election to recall respondents L. A. Robinson, Bert E. Conely and Charles L. Vance from their offices as mayor and commissioners, respectively, of the City of Texas City.
In a trial before the court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jamison v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. Standard Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- King Manufacturing Co. v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Street v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of San Antonio v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Nunn v. NewTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- City of San Antonio v. Rodriguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2004
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.