Legal Opinion

BOR. OF EATONTOWN v. Danskin

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 6, 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

121 N.J. Super. 68 (1972)

296 A.2d 81

THE BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

BENJAMIN H. DANSKIN, COUNTY CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Argued October 6, 1972.

Decided October 6, 1972.

Mr. Henry J. Saling argued the cause for plaintiff (Messrs. Saling, Moore, O'Mara & Coogan, Attorneys).

Mr. William E. Russell argued the cause for defendant (Messrs. Pillsbury, Barnacle, Russell & Carton, Attorneys).

LANE, J.S.C.

This matter is before the court on the return of an order to show cause why…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Borough of Matawan v. Monmouth County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Switz v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Smith v. Township of LivingstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. Union Terminal Cold Storage Co. v. SpenceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Darby v. New Castle Gunning Bedford Education Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  2. Loigman v. Township CommitteeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. Inc. v. Borough Point PleasantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Finkel v. Township Committee of the Township of HopewellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  5. Lawrence v. SchrofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API