Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Hayden

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873No. 3,374PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Belcher, J.:

This action was commenced in April, 1868, to set aside a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Jane Leonora *336Hayden, and against the plaintiffs, in June, 1861, and to establish the right of the plaintiffs as the heirs at law of one David Hayden to an interest in about seventy acres of land in the Western Addition to the City of San Francisco. In May, 1869, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, to which the defendants, of whom there are about two hundred, answered. On the 10th of January, 1871, the case, being then reached in its order on the calendar for…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. McKeighan v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Froebrich v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Doyle v. HamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Lang Syne Gold Mining Co. v. RossNevada Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API