Lang Syne Gold Mining Co. v. Ross
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Humboldt County. R. R. Bigelow, District Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. The complaint shows a sufficient case for relief within the well settled principles of equity jurisprudence. (United States v. Throckmorton, 4 Saw. 51; 98 IT. S. 65.) II. A motion to set aside a judgment by default cannot be made after the expiration of the term at which the judgment is entered.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the State of Nevada, Humboldt County. R. R. Bigelow, District Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. I. The complaint shows a sufficient case for relief within the well settled principles of equity jurisprudence. (United States v. Throckmorton, 4 Saw. 51; 98 IT. S. 65.) II. A motion to set aside a judgment by default cannot be made after the expiration of the term at which the judgment is entered. (Morrison v. Dapman, 3 Cal. 255; Suydam v. Pitcher, 4 Cal. 280; Garpentier v. flart, 5 Cal. 406; liobb v. Mobb, 6 Cal. 21; Branger v. Chevalier, 9 Cal. 172;…
1Opinion of the Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. This is an action in equity to set aside, upon the ground of fraud, the judgment, execution, certificate of sale, and deeds thereunder, in the suit of Gould v. TheLang Syne G. M. Co., and to compel the respondent to convey to plaintiff the property obtained thereby. The complaint sets forth the facts constituting the alleged fraud, and other matters which it is claimed entitles plaintiff to the relief demanded. Among other things, it is averred that in 1882 one S. L. Loomis was the general superintendent and managing agent of plaintiff, a corporation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Brush v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- White v. SheldonNevada Supreme Court · 1868
- Bibend v. KreutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bankers Trust Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Century Insurance Company, Limited, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Sweeney v. SweeneyNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Lauer v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1943
- Wolff v. WolffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.