Legal Opinion
Jerlian Watch Company, Inc. v. United States Department of Commerce and United States Department of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1979No. 79-4144PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
A number of watch manufacturers sued the Secretaries of Interior and Commerce to challenge the validity of the 1979 Allocation Rules, 43 Fed.Reg. 60313 (Dec. 27, 1978), promulgated pursuant to the Secretaries’ authority under Headnote 6(d), Schedule 7, Part 2(E), of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, 19 U.S.C. § 1202. The district court dismissed the action for want of jurisdiction, on the ground that exclusive jurisdiction lay in the Customs Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1582(a). Because the challenged rules are substantially related to a traditional customs purpose, and because plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sneaker Circus, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Croton Watch Co., Inc. v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- The Timken Company v. William E. Simon, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Arthur J. Fritz, Jr. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Air Parcel Forwarding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Vivitar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- American Air Parcel Forwarding Company, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Cornet Stores v. Azie Taylor Morton, Treasurer of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Special Commodity Group on Non-Rubber Footwear From Brazil v. BaldridgeUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.