Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Benson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1982No. A7901-00080, CA 18573PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiffs, purchasers under a contract for the sale of real property, brought this action for specific performance of that contract. Defendants-third-party plaintiffs (defendants), vendors under the contract, sought indemnity from Safeco, which had issued a policy of title insurance covering the property. Safeco, in turn, sought cancellation of that policy. The trial court ordered specific performance by the defendants but, in the event that they did not perform within 60 days, ordered that they pay damages. The court also ordered the title insurance policy rescinded. Defendants appeal. We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heider v. DietzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Freedman v. CHOLICK ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. CRAHANE v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bethurem v. HammettWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cameron v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mostrong v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  4. Ventana Partners, LLC v. Lanoue Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Bethurem v. HammettWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API