Legal Opinion

State v. Pentland

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 18, 2010No. SC 18178PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The defendant, Robert Pentland III, appeals from the ruling of the trial court directing him to register as a sex offender pursuant to General Statutes § 54-251 (a), 1 a provision of the statutory scheme commonly referred to as “Megan’s Law.” 2 The defendant claims that he is exempt from the mandatory registration provisions of § 54-251 (a) because, at the time he entered his plea to an offense for which such registration is required, the trial court failed to advise him of that registration requirement as § 54-251 (a) requires. We disagree that the defendant is exempt from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. State v. T.R.D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. TemelkoskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. DillardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. State v. WalkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. State v. LittleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API