Legal Opinion

Muskogee Fair Haven Manor Phase I, Inc. v. Scott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1998No. 86993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

¶ 1 The dispositive issue is whether the district court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief to a taxpayer who, without first invoking any judicial remedy provided in the Ad Valorem Tax Code, commences an action, challenging the county assessor’s refusal to recognize an exemption claimed under a self-executing provision of the Oklahoma Constitution. We answer in the negative and hold that the legislatively prescribed judicial remedies afforded to these taxpayers under the Code are adequate and exclusive, and that the district court therefore lacked subject matter…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Independent School District No. 9 v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Black v. GeisslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. IN THE MATTER OF THE ASSESSMENTS FOR TAX YEAR 2012 OF CERTAIN PROPERTIESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
  5. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. HernandezCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API