Legal Opinion
Spinning v. Hudson & Manhattan R. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 16, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
11 N.J. Super. 333 (1951)
78 A.2d 284
CLAIRE K. SPINNING, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 8, 1951.
Decided January 16, 1951.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Theodore C. Baer argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Theodore C. Provost, attorney).
Mr. Charles W. Broadhurst argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Markley & Broadhurst, attorneys; Mr. Edward A. Markley and Mr. Patrick F. McDevitt, on the brief).
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- J. B. Wolfe, Inc. v. SalkindSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Jones v. LahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Kappel v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Lambert v. Trenton & Mercer County Traction Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
- Hahn v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Edward J. Russell v. City of WildwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Slovak Catholic Sokol v. FotiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Gibson v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951