Legal Opinion

Lay's Adm'r v. Harlan Producers Coal Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 7, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

For some four or five years previous to July 27, 1934, Charlie Lay was in the employ of the appellee and defendant below, Harlan Producers Coal Corporation, mainly as a practical electrician. His duties chiefly consisted in constructing and maintainng outside wiring for telephone and electrical purposes in the operation of defendant’s small coal mine, and in furnishing and supplying its miners’ residences with such utilities, as well as supplying the Company itself with them. As such employee he had prior to that time constructed and installed an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Nelson Creek Coal Co. v. BransfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. West Kentucky Coal Co. v. SmithersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Combs v. W. P. Sullivan & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Lowden v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Poli's Adm'r v. Cloversplint Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API