Hartman v. Town of Hooksett
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
The plaintiff brought suit in separate actions against the Hooksett Police Commission and the Town of Hooksett, alleging that the defendants were negligent in failing to warn the plaintiff of a defect in a State highway resulting from frost actions. The defendants filed motions to dismiss on the ground that the pleadings failed to state a cause of action. After a hearing on the motions, the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) granted defendants’ motions to dismiss. Plaintiff appeals from those orders. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
“In ruling on a motion to dismiss, all facts properly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Warren v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Massengill v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Weld Power Industries, Inc. v. C.S.I. Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Levesque v. LevesqueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Bridgham v. EffinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Sintros v. HamonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Doucette v. Town of Bristol & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- City of Dover v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Chasan v. Village District of EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.