Legal Opinion
Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided July 19, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-313-1-MAC, 83-314-2-MACPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*822ORDER
OWENS, Chief Judge.
These actions, consolidated for purposes of pretrial proceedings and trial, involve a wrongful death and personal injury claim against Uniroyal, Inc. (Uniroyal), Southern Railway Company (Southern), and Seaboard System Railroad, Inc. (Seaboard). Plaintiffs’ claim against Southern has been dismissed by prior order of this court. Southern remains as a party by virtue of defendant Uniroyal’s cross-claim for indemnity or contribution. Uniroyal has also cross-claimed against Seaboard for indemnity or contribution. Presently before this court are motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bradley Center, Inc. v. WessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Coreland v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Roy v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Davis v. Gossett & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Jeremiah Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc., Southern Railway Co., Seaboard System Railroad, Inc., Etc., Southern Railway Co., Third-Party Erma Crockett v. Uniroyal, Inc., Southern Railway Co., Seaboard System Railroad, Inc., Etc., Southern Railway Co., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985