Legal Opinion

Glazier v. Everett

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1916PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a bill in equity under Part II, § 76, of the tax act (St. 1909, c. 490), to redeem land sold for taxes. The case was heard by a judge of the Superior Court,* who, without making any finding of facts, entered a decree in favor of the plaintiff. The evidence was taken by a commissioner. No rulings of law were requested and no exceptions taken. The defendant’s appeal brings the case here. The entry of the decree implies a finding of every fact essential to the right entry of that decree permitted by the evidence. It is for this court to review the evidence and decide the case on its own…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Lindsey v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Murray v. CarothersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  5. Langley v. ChapinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Berman v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Cook v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Durfee v. DurfeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API