Legal Opinion

Van Haltren v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Ekrob to review a judgment of the municipal court of ’Milwaukee county: A. C. Bhazee, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRakNes, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the-crime of larceny, and from a judgment entered upon the verdict of guilty he prosecutes a writ of error in this court. The sole ground relied upon for a reversal of such judgment is that the evidence was not sufficient to support tire verdict.. “If there is any credible evidence which in any reasonable view supports a verdict it cannot be disturbed on appeal.” Lam Yee v. State, 132 Wis. 527, 529, 112 N. W. 425, and cases cited. A careful examination of the testimony convinces us that there is sufficient evidence in the record to-support the verdict,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lam Yee v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clemens v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Olson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Link v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API