Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Helen Marteles

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1950No. 2756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus to the supreme court for the discharge of the petitioner from further imprisonment in the city jail by the respondent. Tbe ground therefor is that such imprisonment constitutes an illegal restraint resulting from an unlawful and void increase of punishment pursuant to a circuit court’s sentence which aggravated a distinct magistrate’s sentenc • on appeal for mitigation and thereby exceeded the jurisdiction of the circuit court.

The facts are not in dispute. The petitioner was charged in the district court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schooner Robert Lewers Co. v. KekauohaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. KunimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Kahanamoku v. Advertiser PubLishing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. SavidgeHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. MartelesHawaii Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BalucanHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Re Habeas Corpus, BalucanHawaii Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API