Legal Opinion

Brockmueller v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1959No. 1131PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Appellant appeals from a conviction for contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a violation of A.R.S. § 13-822.

The gist of appellant’s first two assignments of error is the insufficiency of the evidence to show any conduct on his part which constitutes a violation of the statute. As indicated by the bill of particulars, the specific charge against him was that he actively urged one Patsy-, a seventeen-year-old girl, to allow certain motion pictures to be taken of her in the nude. Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to show such an urging or encouraging…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Musser v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Loveland v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. RoesslerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. FlinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. State v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. State v. BlodgetteArizona Supreme Court · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API