Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of New Orleans

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 13, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO: 06-4021Published

1Opinion of the Court

SECTION: “J”(4)

ORDER & REASONS

CARL J. BARBIER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against the City of New Orleans on Application of State Law Provisions Regarding Caps on Damages (Rec. Doc. 100) filed by Plaintiffs,. Judon-na Mitchell and LaShonda Saulsberry, and an opposition thereto (Rec. Doc. 108) filed by Defendant the City of New Orleans (“the City”). Having considered the motion and legal memoranda, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Nationwide Agribusiness InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Taylor v. GiddensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API