Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Giddens

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 24, 1993No. 92-C-3054PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

618 So.2d 834 (1993)

Frank H. TAYLOR, et al.

v.

Dr. William R. GIDDENS and Dr. Jack E. Carlisle.

No. 92-C-3054.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 24, 1993.

Garic Kenneth Barranger, Covington, Edmund Mazyck Thomas, Shreveport, for applicant.

Robert G. Pugh, Jr., Pugh, Pugh & Pugh, Samuel W. Caverlee, Cynthia C. Anderson, Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, Shreveport, for respondent.

ORTIQUE, Justice.[1]

We granted writ to determine whether survival actions and/or wrongful death actions are governed by the prescriptive period set forth in LSA-R.S. 9:5628.[2] Plaintiffs, the widower and children of an alleged…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Everett v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  5. State v. BarrasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Brown v. Drillers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. McGee v. AC AND S, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  5. Walls v. American Optical Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API