Legal Opinion

State v. Elk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 2011No. CF090210; A144246PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of public indecency, ORS 163.465, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of 36 months of incarceration and 60 months of post-prison supervision. Defendant argues that the sentence violates ORS 161.605, which provides that the “maximum term of an indeterminate sentence,” combining incarceration and post-prison supervision, for a Class C felony — such as public indecency, ORS 163.465(2)(b)—is 60 months. See State v. Mitchell, 236 Or App 248, 253, 235 P3d 725 (2010). Although defendant admits that his assignment of error is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. ElkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API