In Re Z.A.P.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
{¶ 1} Jonna Gabbard appeals the juvenile court’s decision awarding custody of her biological son, Z.A.P., to his step-grandmother, Debora Wingrove, and contends that the court applied the wrong legal standard. Gabbard argues that in finding her “unsuitable,” the court simply rejected her lifestyle and parenting decisions based upon its own paternalistic view of “societal norms,” rather than determining the issue upon the proper basis of whether her behavior had an adverse effect on her son. She also argues that the evidence does not support the court’s finding that her retention…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re J.K.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- White v. DaviaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Matter of Reaper v. James, 08ca20 (1-13-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re A.G., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018