Legal Opinion

Blackman v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 20, 1956PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is a bill in equity under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 40A, § 21, inserted by St. 1954, c. 368, § 2, by way of appeal from a decision of the board of appeals granting a variance for the erection of a bath house for commercial purposes at Craigville Beach. The bill is brought by three owners of residential property abutting the area in question. One Pendergast, the owner of the property involved, was permitted to intervene. The judge entered a decree to the effect that the board of appeals did not exceed its authority in granting the variance. From this decree the plaintiffs appealed. The evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Bicknell Realty Co. v. Board of Appeal of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Real Properties, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Everpure Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Tanzilli v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Josephs v. Board of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. City Council of Waltham v. VinciulloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Britton v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Ferrante v. Board of Appeals of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API