Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of Woods

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 26, 1978No. 5707-1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Case

A mother appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court permanently depriving her of the custody of one of her children.

A single issue is determinative.

Issue

Were adequate findings of fact entered by the trial court?

Decision

Conclusion. The findings of fact are insufficient for appellate review of the issues presented.

The purpose of findings of fact is to enable an appellate court to determine the basis on which the case was decided in the trial court and to review the questions raised on appeal. Ford v. Bellingham-Whatcom County Dist. Bd. of Health, 16 Wn. App. 709, 717, 558 P.2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wold v. WoldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Ford v. Bellingham-Whatcom County District Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Andrew v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. Tacoma Recycling, Inc. v. Capital Material Handling Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API