Legal Opinion

Murray v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 5, 1975No. 26788Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This original proceeding seeks relief in the nature of prohibition pursuant to C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge the rule.

The primary issue is whether the petitioners are entitled to a jury trial. This proceeding seeks to prohibit the trial judge from proceeding to trial without a jury. In our view, the petitioners were not entitled to a jury trial on the factual issues which are now presented in this case. C.R.C.P. 38(a) and (b).

The history behind this civil action and a review of the record forces us to conclude that the request for a jury trial was properly denied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Setchell v. DellacroceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Rupp v. CoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Scofield v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. Benster v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API