Legal Opinion

Cowlitz Stud Co. v. Clevenger

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 22, 2005No. 30085-1-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 In 1997, Dana Clevenger sustained an industrial injury while employed by Cowlitz Stud Company, a lumber mill. Cowlitz paid her medical benefits and closed her claim. In 2000, while employed by Hampton Lumber Company, Clevenger reopened her 1997 claim. The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) ordered Cowlitz to pay her time loss compensation. But the superior court reversed because reasonable minds could not differ that Clevenger’s 1997 injury had worsened while she worked at Hampton and the “last injurious exposure rule” applied rendering Hampton and not Cowlitz responsible for these…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Syrovy v. Alpine Resources, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API