Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cowlitz Stud Co. v. Clevenger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2006No. 77267-3Published

1Dissent

*578¶20

J.M. Johnson, J.

(dissenting) — The last injurious exposure rule should apply to industrial injury claims, just as it does to occupational disease claims. Cowlitz Stud Company properly raised the last injurious rule to shift potential liability to Hampton Lumber. Petitioner Dana Clevenger, the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I), the industrial appeals judge, or the Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (Board) should have joined Hampton to determine the assignment of liability for Clevenger’s worsened condition. The majority’s conclusion is erroneous. I dissent.

Analysis

¶21 The “last…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Runft v. Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gorman v. Garlock, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gorman v. Garlock, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API