United States v. Aguiar
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POOLER, Circuit Judge:
Acting without a warrant, an agent from the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) placed a global positioning system device (“GPS”) on the Subaru Impreza driven by appellant Stephen Aguiar. The data gathered by the GPS aided law enforcement in identifying avenues of investigation, supported applications for wiretap warrants, and led investigators to other evidence collected and introduced at trial. Appellants sought to suppress the evidence gathered with the aid of GPS data, arguing that the placement and tracking violated the Fourth Amendment. The United States District Court…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Aguiar v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- United States v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Harry KatzinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. GaniasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- United States v. AquartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.