Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 2017No. COA16-1229Published

1DissentArrowood, Judge

*148I agree with the majority that the sweep of the defendant's apartment was lawful. However, I disagree that the warrantless seizure of the shotgun in plain view was unlawful. For that reason, I respectfully dissent.

As the majority points out,

[u]nder the plain view doctrine, a warrantless seizure is lawful if (1) the officer views the evidence from a place where he has legal right to be, (2) it is immediately apparent that the items observed constitute evidence of a crime, are contraband, or are subject to seizure based upon probable cause, and (3) the officer has a lawful right of access to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API